From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB4EE77E3E
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:26:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A0FE719144
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3E62019139
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0B79B42636
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:26:22 +0200
From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20210429092622.6jrty3xz6w2ju7ld@wobu-vie.proxmox.com>
References: <20210422140213.30989-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
 <20210422140213.30989-8-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
 <41e6d9e2-4d4f-b79d-49b4-35696a9aa335@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41e6d9e2-4d4f-b79d-49b4-35696a9aa335@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 backup 07/27] tools: add
 ControlFlow type
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:26:53 -0000

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:17:06AM +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> applied.
> 
> I guess we want to replace that with std::ops::ControlFlow once that is
> stable?

Yeah that's the idea.
Just something to be on the lookout in the future where we may be able
to simplify code.
(Particularly I expect a bunch of `try_fold` calls to become something
simpler like a `try_collect` which IIRC is one of the things they want
to add later when `ControlFlow` and the new try-trait variant are
stable, though I have no idea how long the latter will take...)