From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4FE67531
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  9 Nov 2020 19:28:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 72B8D197C7
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  9 Nov 2020 19:28:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E726D197B7
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  9 Nov 2020 19:28:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF6AC45FC1
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  9 Nov 2020 19:28:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20201109150130.4956-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <1813e06e-7244-3338-3dce-a9d84d7eb6e6@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1ca697b2-bb61-6398-ab75-bbf60aa2e19c@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:28:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1813e06e-7244-3338-3dce-a9d84d7eb6e6@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.105 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] applied series: [PATCH proxmox-backup 00/10] add
 Datastore overview panel
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 18:28:52 -0000

On 09.11.20 18:55, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> * Maybe using a gauge for the usage and putting it besides the task summary
>   element could be better use of space? E.g., a POC here:
>   1080p: https://lamprecht.org/dump/scrots/pbs-ds-summary/poc-summary-1080p-2020-11-09_18.46.03.png
>    720p: https://lamprecht.org/dump/scrots/pbs-ds-summary/poc-summary-720p-2020-11-09_18.46.03.png
> 
> 
> changes of my hacky, not cleaned up, POC below.

FYI: After a quick talk with Martin I applied a slightly cleaned up version of
the POC below, he shared the opinion that the usage is more visible/easier to
parse as a gauge.