From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8821FF163
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:44:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBB00915B;
	Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:44:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1977093523.1347.1729755896052@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <94fac181-79e8-48ce-a7d5-89896e109bdc@proxmox.com>
References: <20241021154744.325556-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <1729692660.eemdwi0dju.astroid@yuna.none>
 <94fac181-79e8-48ce-a7d5-89896e109bdc@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev69
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.049 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 00/10] fix
 catalog dump and shell for split pxar archives
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>


> Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com> hat am 23.10.2024 20:37 CEST geschrieben:
> 
>  
> seems version 3 instead of version 4 of the patches was applied?
> 
> Since there were no code changes (only commit message and git trailer 
> cleanups) not really an issue though.seems version 3 instead of version 
> 4 of the patches was applied?
> 
> Since there were no code changes (only commit message and git trailer 
> cleanups) not really an issue though.

yeah, seems like I had the wrong iteration tagged with `todo` and didn't notice the discrepancy - mea culpa & sorry!


_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel