From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B05CC63370 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:37:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A1CE5FA8A for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:37:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C8F41FA7D for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:37:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8E494424D1 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:37:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:36:56 +0100 (CET) From: Dietmar Maurer To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= Message-ID: <1970589785.367.1606232217036@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20201124130520.1058725-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> References: <20201124130520.1058725-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <20201124130520.1058725-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev13 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.116 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup-qemu 1/2] encryption key tracking: use fingerprint X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:37:09 -0000 Does this improve something? I can't see the purpose of this change. > @@ -152,7 +154,8 @@ pub(crate) fn check_last_encryption_key( > let digest_guard = PREVIOUS_CRYPT_CONFIG_DIGEST.lock().unwrap(); > match (*digest_guard, config) { > (Some(last_digest), Some(current_config)) => { > - crypt_config_digest(current_config) == last_digest > + current_config.fingerprint().bytes() == &last_digest > + || crypt_config_digest(current_config) == last_digest > }, > (None, None) => true, > _ => false, > @@ -440,7 +443,13 @@ pub(crate) async fn finish_backup( > > { > let crypt_config_digest = match crypt_config { > - Some(current_config) => Some(crypt_config_digest(current_config)), > + Some(current_config) => { > + let fp = current_config > + .fingerprint() > + .bytes() > + .to_owned(); > + Some(fp) > + }, > None => None, > }; >