From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E187E98CD4 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:45:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C77DF1546B for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:45:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:45:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1C8CA41E4A for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:45:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:45:49 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Ebner To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Message-ID: <1916386814.3353.1699890349505@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <1699889467.nhdkcuuw11.astroid@yuna.none> References: <20231109184614.1611127-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> <1699880752.fodcayz7zn.astroid@yuna.none> <1419587687.3325.1699888493974@webmail.proxmox.com> <1699889467.nhdkcuuw11.astroid@yuna.none> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev54 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.061 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH-SERIES v4 pxar proxmox-backup proxmox-widget-toolkit 00/26] fix #3174: improve file-level backup X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:45:50 -0000 > On 13.11.2023 16:35 CET Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote: >=20 > IMHO the downside of requiring two runs for the change-detection to > become effective (which is the case for new groups anyhow) is far > smaller than unconditionally breaking all catalog-related features for > older clients with no way of opting out. especially since some of those > features are server-side (file browsing/download for unencrypted > backups, for example), and you might have a mix of clients accessing a > PBS repo. the first run that just changes the catalog format to support > subsequent runs could easily detect and log this state prominently to > avoid confusion. Okay, agreed! I will make the catalog v2 format be conditionally used.