From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C249C0AA8
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:01:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4B5F91E3EE
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:01:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:01:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7579B45348
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:01:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:01:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1870891247.2813.1705046488867@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <be39bad5-280a-4520-9025-eb3023c2277e@proxmox.com>
References: <20240111104036.3341854-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20240111104036.3341854-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <406216126.2803.1705044558912@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <be39bad5-280a-4520-9025-eb3023c2277e@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev57
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.359 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/5] tape: handle duplicate
 label-texts in inventory
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:01:30 -0000

> > That is far more confusing than before, isnt it?
> 
> but don't actually know which of the one in the inventory it is?
> we only have the label and simple chose the first before, but that might be the wrong one...

I see the problem. Still, this is very confusing...