From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9131FF129 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDED92152D; Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:54:19 +0200 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= Subject: partially-applied: [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 16/16] docs/certificates: use correct certificate file name To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Shannon Sterz References: <20260805155308.519896-2-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <20260805155308.519896-18-s.sterz@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260805155308.519896-18-s.sterz@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.17.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1786024406.fff3njfixp.astroid@yuna.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1786024447730 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.100 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: M6H6PC5Q4QBCDPUZSDX45RM5S4FRWRHU X-Message-ID-Hash: M6H6PC5Q4QBCDPUZSDX45RM5S4FRWRHU X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On August 5, 2026 5:53 pm, Shannon Sterz wrote: > instead of the hard-coded `proxy.pem` that is inaccurate by now. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shannon Sterz > --- > docs/certificate-management.rst | 5 +++-- > server/src/auth/certs.rs | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/docs/certificate-management.rst b/docs/certificate-managemen= t.rst > index 9a632118..c85fafef 100644 > --- a/docs/certificate-management.rst > +++ b/docs/certificate-management.rst > @@ -320,8 +320,9 @@ logged: > Apr 04 12:17:51 pdm proxmox-datacenter-manager-daily-update[1170]: Se= lf-signed certificate is valid for an excessive amount of time. Please rene= w it. > =20 > To manually renew a certificate, navigate to Configuration -> Certificat= es. > -Select the certificate ``proxy.pem``. Then click the "Delete Custom > -Certificate" button. Alternatively, you can run the following command: > +Select the certificate ``/etc/proxmox-datacenter-manager/auth/api.pem``.= Then > +click the "Delete Custom Certificate" button. Alternatively, you can run= the > +following command: please fold this part into patch #15 > =20 > .. code-block:: shell > =20 > diff --git a/server/src/auth/certs.rs b/server/src/auth/certs.rs > index 97ee714d..c08ecb6c 100644 > --- a/server/src/auth/certs.rs > +++ b/server/src/auth/certs.rs > @@ -57,5 +57,5 @@ pub fn get_certificate_pem() -> Result, Error> = { > /// Get the `CertificateInfo` struct for the current certificate. > pub fn get_certificate_info() -> Result { > let cert_pem =3D get_certificate_pem()?; > - CertificateInfo::from_pem("proxy.pem", &cert_pem) > + CertificateInfo::from_pem(API_CERT_FN, &cert_pem) because I applied this hunk here as a standalone commit ;)