From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A63F1FF0E5 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:32:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 21BDE213ED; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:32:30 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Shan Shaji Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup v2] fix #5748: docs: add `catalog.pcat1` format specification Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: <178532109947.309401.9715520156184407592.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260717125144.286823-1-s.shaji@proxmox.com> References: <20260717125144.286823-1-s.shaji@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1785321083154 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.139 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: QZH26HJ4P32CVC2CSCZXWLSUQTWPKJDA X-Message-ID-Hash: QZH26HJ4P32CVC2CSCZXWLSUQTWPKJDA X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:51:44 +0200, Shan Shaji wrote: > Earlier proxmox catalog file format specification was not present > inside the docs. fixed it by adding format specification under file > formats. > > Applied with a follow-up, thanks! [1/1] fix #5748: docs: add `catalog.pcat1` format specification commit: a825b0e7a9417f728938e2cd6e21513162a15557 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler