From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77B991FF16F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:25:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4416A495A;
	Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:25:49 +0200
From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250414082845.163300-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250414082845.163300-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: astroid/0.16.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid)
Message-Id: <1744712693.r64hp93gpu.astroid@yuna.none>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.046 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com, verify.rs]
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH backup] verify: print number of chunks
 failing verification
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On April 14, 2025 10:28 am, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote:
> We also re-use the error_count variable defined right above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/backup/verify.rs | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/backup/verify.rs b/src/backup/verify.rs
> index 3d2cba8ac..1344b3b22 100644
> --- a/src/backup/verify.rs
> +++ b/src/backup/verify.rs
> @@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ fn verify_index_chunks(
>          "  verified {read_bytes_mib:.2}/{decoded_bytes_mib:.2} MiB in {elapsed:.2} seconds, speed {read_speed:.2}/{decode_speed:.2} MiB/s ({error_count} errors)"
>      );
>  
> -    if errors.load(Ordering::SeqCst) > 0 {
> -        bail!("chunks could not be verified");
> +    if error_count > 0 {
> +        bail!("{error_count} chunks could not be verified");

but the error count is already included in the log message right before
it?

if we do this, then the message before it should be changed to just
indicate success/failure, logging the error count twice doesn't make
much sense..

>      }
>  
>      Ok(())
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pbs-devel mailing list
> pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel