From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4871FF15E
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue,  8 Apr 2025 13:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 556BB1A1B0;
	Tue,  8 Apr 2025 13:26:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue,  8 Apr 2025 13:25:49 +0200
Message-Id: <174411153904.846403.15031024530708283699.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250318094756.204368-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20250318094756.204368-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.036 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/2] fix: ui: sync
 job: edit rate limit based on sync direction
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:47:55 +0100, Christian Ebner wrote:
> Commit 9aa213b8 ("ui: sync job: adapt edit window to be used for pull
> and push") adapted the sync job edit so jobs in both, push and pull
> can be edited using the same window. This however did not include the
> switching of the direction to which the http client rate limit is
> applied to.
> 
> Fix this by further adding the edit field for `rate-out` and
> conditionally hide the less useful rate limit direction (rate-out for
> pull and rate-in for push). This allows to preserve the values if
> explicitly set via the sync job config.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] fix: ui: sync job: edit rate limit based on sync direction
      commit: 37a85cf616b61932ca1417c30f876178ce90c6c4
[2/2] docs: mention how to set the push sync jobs rate limit
      commit: 266becd156f8c01dbc5268d59fedfeb88c779f92


_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel