From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] docs: deduplicate background details for garbage collection
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:50:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1731505655.nd5vn0ks6l.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241031154554.585068-2-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
On October 31, 2024 4:45 pm, Christian Ebner wrote:
> Currently, common details regarding garbage collection are documented
> in the backup client and the maintenance task. Deduplicate this
> information by moving the details to the background section of the
> maintenance task and reference that section in the backup client
> part.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> docs/backup-client.rst | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
> docs/maintenance.rst | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/backup-client.rst b/docs/backup-client.rst
> index e56e0625b..892be11d9 100644
> --- a/docs/backup-client.rst
> +++ b/docs/backup-client.rst
> @@ -789,29 +789,25 @@ Garbage Collection
> ------------------
>
> The ``prune`` command removes only the backup index files, not the data
> -from the datastore. This task is left to the garbage collection
> -command. It is recommended to carry out garbage collection on a regular basis.
> +from the datastore. Deletion of unused backup data from the datastore is done by
> +:ref:`garbage collection<_maintenance_gc>`. It is therefore recommended to
> +schedule garbage collection tasks on a regular basis. The working principle of
> +garbage collection is described in more details in the related :ref:`background
> +section <gc_background>`.
>
> -The garbage collection works in two phases. In the first phase, all
> -data blocks that are still in use are marked. In the second phase,
> -unused data blocks are removed.
> +To start garbage collection from the client side, run the following command:
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> + # proxmox-backup-client garbage-collect
>
> .. note:: This command needs to read all existing backup index files
> and touches the complete chunk-store. This can take a long time
> depending on the number of chunks and the speed of the underlying
> disks.
>
> -.. note:: The garbage collection will only remove chunks that haven't been used
> - for at least one day (exactly 24h 5m). This grace period is necessary because
> - chunks in use are marked by touching the chunk which updates the ``atime``
> - (access time) property. Filesystems are mounted with the ``relatime`` option
> - by default. This results in a better performance by only updating the
> - ``atime`` property if the last access has been at least 24 hours ago. The
> - downside is that touching a chunk within these 24 hours will not always
> - update its ``atime`` property.
> -
> - Chunks in the grace period will be logged at the end of the garbage
> - collection task as *Pending removals*.
> +The progress of the garbage collection will be displayed as shown in the example
> +below:
>
> .. code-block:: console
>
> diff --git a/docs/maintenance.rst b/docs/maintenance.rst
> index b6d42ecc2..01c24ea7d 100644
> --- a/docs/maintenance.rst
> +++ b/docs/maintenance.rst
> @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ It's recommended to setup a schedule to ensure that unused space is cleaned up
> periodically. For most setups a weekly schedule provides a good interval to
> start.
>
> +.. _gc_background:
> +
> GC Background
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> @@ -215,17 +217,28 @@ datastore or interfering with other backups.
> The garbage collection (GC) process is performed per datastore and is split
> into two phases:
>
> -- Phase one: Mark
> - All index files are read, and the access time of the referred chunk files is
> - updated.
> -
> -- Phase two: Sweep
> - The task iterates over all chunks, checks their file access time, and if it
> - is older than the cutoff time (i.e., the time when GC started, plus some
> - headroom for safety and Linux file system behavior), the task knows that the
> - chunk was neither referred to in any backup index nor part of any currently
> - running backup that has no index to scan for. As such, the chunk can be
> - safely deleted.
> +- Phase one (Mark):
> +
> + All index files are read, and the access time (``atime``) of the referred
pre-existing, but "referenced" fits better IMHO
> + chunk files is updated.
> +
> +- Phase two (Sweep):
> +
> + The task iterates over all chunks and checks their file access time. If it is
> + older than the cutoff time given by either 24 hours and 5 minutes after the
> + start time of the garbage collection or the start time of the oldest backup
> + writer instance, the garbage collection can consider the chunk as neither
> + referenced by any backup index nor part of any currently running backup.
> + Therefore, the chunk can be safely deleted.
Should we re-order/simplify this, and first explain/define the cutoff,
and then (in a separate sentence) describe how it is used?
> +
> + Chunks within the grace period will not be deleted and logged at the end of
> + the garbage collection task as *Pending removals*.
> +
> +.. note:: The grace period for backup chunk removal is not arbitrary, but stems
> + from the fact that filesystems are typically mounted with the ``relatime``
> + option by default. This results in better performance by only updating the
> + ``atime`` property if a file has been modified since the last access or the
> + last access has been at least 24 hours ago.
>
> Manually Starting GC
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pbs-devel mailing list
> pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-31 15:45 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] docs: add security implications of prune and change detection mode Christian Ebner
2024-10-31 15:45 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] docs: deduplicate background details for garbage collection Christian Ebner
2024-11-13 13:50 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2024-11-13 13:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] docs: add security implications of prune and change detection mode Fabian Grünbichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1731505655.nd5vn0ks6l.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox