From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8636E1FF164 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:28:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2F5D91AB0E; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:28:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fu-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To :From:Cc:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fLpsUSxxN8u92kZbr7pGx3r74fYJCe5JCI7fVhZ3zPA=; t=1729098358; x=1729703158; b=cSEvBGl+lcLIoYoT4Qu9GHpmRePBou9SApCpXT1ir9390lD9X6kbDLax+amZQIK9Skb9pYUHIh+ ExAKI4BUfN0AgSnZGNxz1PKmDVzLAHvhAMQL+YQUMdIZO46sTibNvWVukn3jNhXGMCDrn++YVNMdB SpdfmNDLK3w5cdLN9MXBwMWiECcEzCBEjdoFP0VRmsppQnJI6373ICWekBUzuXrMhD5Z/BJ0zJVTu 32JX6/9RMerFNOqjnkXtIy6UhEqnEK7Xsytwop7RW73qo9H+p/+XvtK9ng+c7A8Iare2dnF7YNHK7 W9guQRCkZfAE8Ahv0MaXab0v+Am7EopYE4uw==; Message-ID: <1669f329-e694-4a6f-9352-5c52b92050c2@fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:05:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht References: <8fe24024-9416-45af-9d7a-d53dceee5543@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Cornelius Hoffmann In-Reply-To: <8fe24024-9416-45af-9d7a-d53dceee5543@proxmox.com> X-Original-Sender: c.hoffmann@fu-berlin.de X-Originating-IP: 160.45.64.184 X-ZEDAT-Hint: PO X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [fu-berlin.de] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:28:57 +0200 Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PVE-User] pbs - Nasty atime bug in Ubuntu's kernel-builtin zfs X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" Hi Thomas, On 16.10.24 17:56, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > note that Proxmox maintains > its own ZFS downstream package for both user-space tools and kernel > module. > > Both the bad commit and the fix were in ZFS 2.2.3 [0], and unlike Ubuntu > we never backported the problematic commit manually, so the Proxmox > kernel and its ZFS module were never affected, FWICT. Good to hear, mainly just wanted to make sure it stays that way :D And maybe warn other people, since there are threads on the forum about running PBS as a container, mostly LXC but also some that are not on proxmox. > > I also tried the reproducer, as it is simple enough and just to be sure, > and I could_not_ observe the broken behavior from ZFS. I setup a PBS in a VM in the meantime for testing and also couldn't reproduce it with your kernel. Best, Cornelius _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel