From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF7C712A9 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:33:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF0B4CC65 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:33:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 054DACC5A for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:33:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D22ED465C2 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:33:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:33:31 +0200 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <20210517131101.23490-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20210517131101.23490-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1621326804.8t97fy5sgr.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.011 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, mod.rs] Subject: [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox 0/2] remove unnecessary websocket code X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 08:33:39 -0000 On May 17, 2021 3:10 pm, Dominik Csapak wrote: > similar reasoning as for pve[0] but here we only have to consider > xtermjs >=20 > same rules for compat/client code applies, if we apply for 1.x we > can drop the client protocol in 2.0 and compat in 3.0 > else the client code in 3.0 and compat code in 4.0 >=20 > we only have to make sure that we do that in lockstep with pve/pmg, > since they share pve-xtermjs >=20 > 0: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2021-May/048216.html >=20 > Dominik Csapak (2): > proxmox-http/websocket: remove code for 'text' frames > proxmox-http/websocket: remove subprotocol handling >=20 > proxmox-http/src/websocket/mod.rs | 39 ++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >=20 > --=20 > 2.20.1 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pbs-devel mailing list > pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 =