From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E5365CBD for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:43:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9FDBC14F01 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:43:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 448FE14EF7 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:43:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F8DA45D50 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:43:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 08:43:22 +0100 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Thomas Lamprecht References: <20201104131026.4017010-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <20201104131026.4017010-3-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <6671a9c8-9cbd-3ce0-145f-d8cb5edde6ce@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <6671a9c8-9cbd-3ce0-145f-d8cb5edde6ce@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1604562134.h980kyx4bv.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 3/4] api: refactor remote client and add remote scan X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 07:43:28 -0000 On November 4, 2020 6:12 pm, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > we probably also do not want to bubble up the 401 error our server gets > from the remote server, as I then get logged out by the gui which thinks > the 401 are from our server... that's a good gotcha. should we just map errors to a generic 400=20 prefixed with 'scanning remote '{}' failed' ? =