From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B904361C5B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:01:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A5D3C1F5FB
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:00:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9ABE51F5EE
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:00:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5DBAE45DBC
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:00:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:00:48 +0200
From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20201021140159.2250193-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
 <1603353403.2oxwp8ptb8.astroid@nora.none>
 <20201022091729.GA14703@gaia.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201022091729.GA14703@gaia.proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid)
Message-Id: <1603364357.xcuh6abcww.astroid@nora.none>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] add datastore info api call
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:01:25 -0000

On October 22, 2020 11:17 am, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> hi,
>=20
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:02:23AM +0200, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
>>=20
>> why READ and not AUDIT | BACKUP ? why partial if you only pass a single=20
>> privilege?
>=20
> i thought the minimum privilege should be view. one might want to add a
> datastore where only read access is given to them, to be able to restore
> backups from it for example. imposing audit/backup privs would prevent
> this, afaict

AUDIT is the permission that determines visibility of a datastore, READ=20
is the permission to read its *contents*. this api call is not related=20
to reading arbitrary datastore contents, so it should not require that=20
permission.
=