From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75A81FF38E for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:42:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 28D0F3406C; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:42:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:42:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Dietmar Maurer To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Dominik Csapak Message-ID: <1528294508.2270.1718098952347@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20240611093046.1092265-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20240611093046.1092265-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev65 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.353 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] docs: add note for not using remote storages X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" > On 11.6.2024 11:30 CEST Dominik Csapak wrote: > > > such as NFS or SMB. They will not provide the expected performance > and it's better to recommend against them. > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak > --- > if we want to discourage users even more, we could also detect it on > datastore creation and put a warning into the task log > > also if we ever come around to implementing the 'health' page thomas > wished for, we can put a warning/error there too > > docs/system-requirements.rst | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/system-requirements.rst b/docs/system-requirements.rst > index fb920865..17756b7b 100644 > --- a/docs/system-requirements.rst > +++ b/docs/system-requirements.rst > @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ Recommended Server System Requirements > * Use only SSDs, for best results > * If HDDs are used: Using a metadata cache is highly recommended, for example, > add a ZFS :ref:`special device mirror `. > + * While it's technically possible to use remote storages such as NFS or SMB, > + the additional latency and overhead drastically reduces performance and it's > + not recommended to use such a setup. > > * Redundant Multi-GBit/s network interface cards (NICs) > > -- > 2.39.2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > pbs-devel mailing list > pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel