On 5/31/24 12:40, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> for reference, as discussed off-list
> 
> there seems to be an issue (with this version at least, not sure if it's 
> actually a regression)
> that does not correctly reuse entries after encountering a changed file
> 
> (changed 1 file + added one file (~20MiB) and only ~600 out of ~500000 
> (~10GiB) were reused)

Thanks for reporting this and swift help to find the underlying issue 
Dominik!
The fix will be included in an upcoming version 9 of the patches, I 
still want to wait a bit for eventual further feedback before spamming 
the mailing list with to many intermediate iterations.
For now, the attached patch can be applied as followup to the series to 
fix this issue.