From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367D964977
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:18:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2293115B59
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:17:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1C49F15B4C
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:17:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E014945FA3;
 Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:17:47 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Graeme Seaton <lists@graemes.com>
References: <215c8b24-84f6-c244-f3d0-347390001707@graemes.com>
 <d3249ddb-e2a6-bf33-450f-ba8109c6dc82@proxmox.com>
 <d9bfbe53-a3e3-2f24-2e67-213ef1548893@graemes.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <0f8471ae-c9da-2283-b142-324129ce2b78@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:17:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d9bfbe53-a3e3-2f24-2e67-213ef1548893@graemes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.010 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.261 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Verify, Prune & GC sequence
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:18:19 -0000

Hi Graeme,

On 30.10.20 17:31, Graeme Seaton wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>=20
> Thanks for the reply - didn't really want stay up to midnight to check =
;-)=C2=A0 At the moment, scheduling only allows daily (which is invoked a=
t 00:00).=C2=A0 If (when?) I can specify custom times then I'll probably =
use the sequence you described.
>=20

You can already specify custom times, just edit it, "daily" is just set a=
s default
when creating a new job.

cheers,
Thomas