From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1E01FF137 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:39:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2FC9131558; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:40:37 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <0dc879de-f02f-47db-b9ed-226b6662eef3@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:40:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 proxmox-backup 07/18] datastore: verify that chunk_size is a power of two To: Robert Obkircher , pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260210150642.469670-1-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> <20260210150642.469670-8-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> <376f156b-4343-4be4-8653-2b58fff4abd0@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Christian Ebner In-Reply-To: <376f156b-4343-4be4-8653-2b58fff4abd0@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1771321225622 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.047 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: MM4G3A32KETI6OCEVACBBCA53CRRMKSH X-Message-ID-Hash: MM4G3A32KETI6OCEVACBBCA53CRRMKSH X-MailFrom: c.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 2/17/26 10:13 AM, Robert Obkircher wrote: > > On 2/10/26 16:05, Robert Obkircher wrote: >> Guarantee that the bitmasks used to compute the modulo actually yield >> the correct value and implicitly guard against divisions by zero. > > The bitmask trick for faster modulo operations is used by the Reader > [1] and Writer [2]. > > [1] > https://git.proxmox.com/?p=proxmox-backup.git;a=blob;f=pbs-datastore/src/fixed_index.rs;h=6c3be2d492d3b15a04b2d4356d7183d75c349f26;hb=HEAD#l210 > > [2] > https://git.proxmox.com/?p=proxmox-backup.git;a=blob;f=pbs-datastore/src/fixed_index.rs;h=6c3be2d492d3b15a04b2d4356d7183d75c349f26;hb=HEAD#l380 > > > [..] Thanks for the pointer, the information where these operations are being used should be folded into the commit message, that can however be done when applying if nothing else comes up.