From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795621FF16B
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Jan 2025 11:10:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6108AA6F1;
	Thu,  9 Jan 2025 11:10:13 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <0705c954-503d-4ac6-a7ad-12254824cf15@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:09:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
References: <20241209104606.263045-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: de-AT, en-US
From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20241209104606.263045-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox{, -backup,
 -perl-rs} v2 0/4] Rename/Move logging init helper
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On  2024-12-09 11:46, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> To make all the logging init functions easier to use renamed all and moved to
> `init` module. Like this we don't have to use a e.g. 'init_pve_logger' function
> in a shared helper, which isn't strictly true, as it can be pbs as well.
> 
> The is backwards compatible as the old functions have not been removed and are
> only deprecated. This also means the first two `proxmox` patches can already be
> applied independently of the other ones.
> 

Sorry for the delay in taking a look at this.

Tested-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>

(tested the pve-rs part, the changes in proxmox-backup only adapt
to the renamed function)

Thanks!

-- 
- Lukas



_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel