From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D27707DD
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  6 Sep 2021 12:48:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B9F3F7F9
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  6 Sep 2021 12:47:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2BE75F7EB
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  6 Sep 2021 12:47:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E5BBD445C0
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  6 Sep 2021 12:47:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <05b89644-d4c8-931a-e52d-fa67d0a91b03@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 12:47:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:92.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/92.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20210903071752.1225271-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20210906102528.3bp6fotg4zoaqazb@olga.proxmox.com>
 <645015c1-6a9e-a744-a931-234e4ba1027c@proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <645015c1-6a9e-a744-a931-234e4ba1027c@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.608 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -2.332 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [RFC PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] pbs-config: use
 trait object for the backup lock guard
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:48:21 -0000

[...]
>>
> 
> sound ok in general, but then we have to make the field public no ?
> and then we could also open a bug file too, no change in the type needed 
> at all... but i thought we want to avoid making the underlying field 
> public...
> 
> 

i meant a 'bogus' file here, not bug...