From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2301FF165
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:24:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3CC7C11278;
	Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:24:39 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <01a0b4f9-c8e2-49b2-ad64-a9cfc42a1e77@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:24:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250211162639.141541-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
 <20250211162639.141541-3-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
 <4b0509f6-98e2-46e7-ad13-5e54bb13834c@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <4b0509f6-98e2-46e7-ad13-5e54bb13834c@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [ceph.com, proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH backup v2 2/2] disks: wipe: only zero out
 the first 1 MiB
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 11/02/2025 19:42, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> I have some faint remembrance that we had to increase the area we zero
> out for ceph OSDs and/or for the installer.

You are right. We zero out the first 200 MiB to prevent a problem with
OSD creation. [0] [1] Although I am unable to reproduce this on Ceph
Quincy, making sure the disk is properly wiped does not hurt. So we can
drop this patch.

[0] 
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b3caf4f2153bff3c0db7726275a571fbd1f07e0
[1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22354



_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel