From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2301FF165 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:24:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3CC7C11278; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:24:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <01a0b4f9-c8e2-49b2-ad64-a9cfc42a1e77@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:24:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20250211162639.141541-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com> <20250211162639.141541-3-f.schauer@proxmox.com> <4b0509f6-98e2-46e7-ad13-5e54bb13834c@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <4b0509f6-98e2-46e7-ad13-5e54bb13834c@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [ceph.com, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH backup v2 2/2] disks: wipe: only zero out the first 1 MiB X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> On 11/02/2025 19:42, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > I have some faint remembrance that we had to increase the area we zero > out for ceph OSDs and/or for the installer. You are right. We zero out the first 200 MiB to prevent a problem with OSD creation. [0] [1] Although I am unable to reproduce this on Ceph Quincy, making sure the disk is properly wiped does not hurt. So we can drop this patch. [0] https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b3caf4f2153bff3c0db7726275a571fbd1f07e0 [1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22354 _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel