From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2446F1FF13B for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 16:20:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6A0ECB6D8; Wed, 20 May 2026 16:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 16:20:13 +0200 From: Gabriel Goller To: Thomas Lamprecht Subject: Re: [PATCH network] ui: sdn: fabrics: drop dead disabled bindings Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Lamprecht , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260520125125.251655-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> <58f70cc4-2aa1-4e02-97f1-448868036948@proxmox.com> <1226cfe8-f171-42eb-b9b8-3b46beb8659d@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1226cfe8-f171-42eb-b9b8-3b46beb8659d@proxmox.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20241002-35-39f9a6 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779286798535 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: OLSCE6Q3AMRQZGU44NLWZBVWRD477MCT X-Message-ID-Hash: OLSCE6Q3AMRQZGU44NLWZBVWRD477MCT X-MailFrom: g.goller@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 20.05.2026 16:05, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 20.05.26 um 16:00 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > >> - cbind: { > >> - disabled: '{!isCreate}', > >> - deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}', > >> - }, > >> + deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}', > > using that template syntax only makes sense inside a bind (viewModel) or > > cbind (config bind), but you move them out of there, so this is not basically > > a literal string. Should be rather changed to a literal true or false or > > just dropped > > > >> }); > >> } > >> > >> @@ -86,10 +83,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.sdn.Fabric.Fabric.Edit', { > >> name: 'ip6_prefix', > >> allowBlank: true, > >> skipEmptyText: true, > >> - cbind: { > >> - disabled: '{!isCreate}', > >> - deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}', > >> - }, > >> + deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}', > > same here > > ah, I think you wanted to just drop the "disabled: '{!isCreate}'," line? Nah, I actually wanted deleteEmtpy: !me.isCreate, (without the cbind) -_- I'll send a new version