From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83D3D62EEB
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:40:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 765A41C6E6
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:40:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D74811C6DD
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:40:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 394993C9F6E; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:40:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>) id 1nJLbF-0006hA-Uw
for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:36:01 +0100
From: Marco Gaiarin <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:14:24 +0100
Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!!
Message-ID: <ud5odi-lb51.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
References: <odshdi-fah.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
<mailman.162.1644664007.452.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1644783293 25295 192.168.1.24 (13 Feb 2022
20:14:53 GMT)
To: Arjen via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (Linux/5.4.0-99-generic (x86_64))
X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 <news.lilliput.linux.it>
Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
In-Reply-To: <mailman.162.1644664007.452.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>;
from SmartGate on Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 21:36:01PM +0100
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.168 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Old, 32bit, debian and clock drift.
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:40:13 -0000
Mandi! Arjen via pve-user
In chel di` si favelave...
> Possibly both the para-virtualized clock source and the ntp daemon are adjusting for drift and therefore overcompensating and making everything worse.
> Try disabling ntpd, stop and start the VM and see if that works better? It works well for my VMs, but they are not running 24/7.
Ahem, the VM in question IS the NTP server for that site... but i've a
dozens of site like that, and this seems the only one with a clock drift...
--
Di questa cavolo di pianura, di questa gente senza misura, che gia`
confonde la notte e il giorno, e la partenza con il ritorno, e la
richezza con i rumore, ed il diritto con il favore (F. De Gregori)