From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FBAD1FF165 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:22:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E5B8511914; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:24:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: "Shannon Sterz" In-Reply-To: (Shannon Sterz's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:02:06 +0200") References: <20250721144411.326170-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:23:47 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1755174194725 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.102 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v2] pvesr: Document replication network setting X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" "Shannon Sterz" writes: > On Mon Jul 21, 2025 at 4:44 PM CEST, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval >> --- >> Differences from v1: >> - s/live guest migration/guest migration/ >> >> pvesr.adoc | 18 +++++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/pvesr.adoc b/pvesr.adoc >> index 9ad02f5..186a1bd 100644 >> --- a/pvesr.adoc >> +++ b/pvesr.adoc >> @@ -184,11 +184,19 @@ This ID must only be specified manually if the CLI tool is used. >> Network >> ------- >> >> -Replication traffic will use the same network as the live guest migration. By >> -default, this is the management network. To use a different network for the >> -migration, configure the `Migration Network` in the web interface under >> -`Datacenter -> Options -> Migration Settings` or in the `datacenter.cfg`. See >> -xref:pvecm_migration_network[Migration Network] for more details. >> +By default replication traffic will go through the same network as the guest >> +migration traffic. If the migration network is not set this will in turn default >> +to the management network. >> + >> +To use a different network for the replication traffic, configure the >> +`Replication Network` in the web interface under `Datacenter -> Options -> >> +Replication Settings` or set the `replication` property in the `datacenter.cfg` >> +file: >> + >> +---- >> +# use dedicated replication network >> +replication: secure,network=10.1.2.0/24 >> +---- >> >> Command-line Interface Examples >> ------------------------------- > > looks good to me, so: > > Reviewed-by: Shannon Sterz Bump -- Maximiliano _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel