From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745451FF172 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:12:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1C018321C8; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:12:17 +0200 (CEST) References: <20250304104954.191259-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 30.1 From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Proxmox VE development discussion Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 15:09:50 +0200 In-reply-to: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.097 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer] gui: always set visible-child-name on disk dialog X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" "Christoph Heiss" writes: > On Tue Mar 4, 2025 at 11:49 AM CET, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote: >> Whenever a filesystem is selected we show the size selection stack page. >> >> At the moment entering any raid setup, then entering the Advanced >> Options page and then selecting any non-raid setup will show the >> raiddisk page since it is still the visible child. > > While testing this, I cannot seem to reproduce the original problem on > the latest PVE 8.3-1 ISO. > In the GUI, clicking on "Options" besides the target harddisk, then in > the dialog selecting e.g. "zfs (RAID1)", going to the "Advanced Options" > tab and then selecting e.g. "ext4" above, yields the normal disk sizing > options tab as expected. You are right, I just noticed that not all raid setups reproduce this issue. Selecting the advanced options in "btrfs (RAID10)" and going back to ext4, for example, reproduces the issue. > On the main disk selection page, the dropdown is also updated > accordingly. > > Or is some other combination of inputs required to trigger this bug? > This is just based upon the patch description. The commit message should be updated, I will do that if there is a need for v2. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel