From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 226DF1FF138
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:14:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3EA6F16264;
	Mon,  1 Jun 2026 11:14:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: ribbon <ribbon@skrbn.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: REPOST [PATCH i18n] update Japanese translations
In-Reply-To: <afIJrer_GIsdEXVR@ns.ribbon.or.jp> (ribbon@skrbn.sakura.ne.jp's
	message of "Wed, 29 Apr 2026 22:37:49 +0900")
References: <afIJrer_GIsdEXVR@ns.ribbon.or.jp>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:13:36 +0200
Message-ID: <s8oh5nmhbcv.fsf@toolbox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1780305183398
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.121 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	T_SPF_PERMERROR          0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror)
Message-ID-Hash: Y7S6KWIBZDF3OTJNG3OCLSG76E6MWOGN
X-Message-ID-Hash: Y7S6KWIBZDF3OTJNG3OCLSG76E6MWOGN
X-MailFrom: m.sandoval@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

ribbon <ribbon@skrbn.sakura.ne.jp> writes:

> --- ja.po.old	2026-04-29 21:40:31.694688444 +0900
> +++ ja.po	2026-04-29 22:15:40.163173484 +0900
> @@ -29,9 +29,8 @@
>  msgstr "# Included"
>=20=20
>  #: proxmox-backup/www/window/SyncJobEdit.js:457
> -#, fuzzy
>  msgid "# of Group Workers"
> -msgstr "# =E3=81=AE=E3=83=AF=E3=83=BC=E3=82=AB=E3=82=B9=E3=83=AC=E3=83=
=83=E3=83=89"
> +msgstr "# =E3=81=AE=E3=82=B0=E3=83=AB=E3=83=BC=E3=83=97=E3=83=AF=E3=83=
=BC=E3=82=AB"
>=20=20
>  #: proxmox-backup/www/window/VerifyAll.js:116
>  #: proxmox-backup/www/window/VerifyJobEdit.js:191
> [..]

Thanks for your contribution. The patch does not apply on top of the
current master, would it be possible to rebase it and submit the patch
again?

You can use the msgmerge tool with two different .po files as input in
order to merge translations cleanly.

--=20
Maximiliano