From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997F91FF0E9 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:02:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2736F21438; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:02:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Fiona Ebner Subject: superseded: [PATCH qemu-server] debian: add maintscript to remove unused file In-Reply-To: <581c5a4a-01a0-43c1-bc2b-7123923fe335@proxmox.com> (Fiona Ebner's message of "Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:23:31 +0200") References: <20260320135120.372074-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> <581c5a4a-01a0-43c1-bc2b-7123923fe335@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:02:24 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1784206925715 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.302 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: MAOXFCIF7PPG2HUNCKZGEXBFW7RQQEJ7 X-Message-ID-Hash: MAOXFCIF7PPG2HUNCKZGEXBFW7RQQEJ7 X-MailFrom: m.sandoval@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Fiona Ebner writes: > Am 20.03.26 um 2:51 PM schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval: >> The conffile was moved to LIDBIR in in 4093c3f4a but there was no >> associated cleanup. >>=20 >> If one starts from a version of Proxmox VE older than 9, then the the >> configuration would be at /etc. If the machine is then updated to >> version 9, then both versions will be present, with the version at /etc >> having a higher priority as per modules-load.d(5). In such a case, any >> changes made in the packaged configuration will be ignored. >>=20 >> The rm_config (see dpkg-maintscript-helper(1)) is used to remove the >> trailing config if it was not touched by the user. If the file was >> touched by the user then it is automatically moved and we move it back >> manually so that it continues to have higher preference. >>=20 >> Suggested-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler >> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval > > The versions need to be adapted to match the next qemu-server version > bump. With that: > > Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner > > One more comment inline: > > [..] Superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/all/20260716130103.406573-1-m.sando= val@proxmox.com/T/#u --=20 Maximiliano