From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0461FF0A7 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:06:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 24BAF2131F; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:06:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Michael =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6ppl?= Subject: Re: [PATCH manager 1/1] cephx: rename 'consumer' to 'client' in output and comments In-Reply-To: <20260915145047.754765-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> ("Michael =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6ppl=22's?= message of "Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:50:47 +0200") References: <20260915145047.754765-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:05:54 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1789560355230 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.807 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: IGBOQNUIPSUBBCIQXUNGQFVZ6P6AENLU X-Message-ID-Hash: IGBOQNUIPSUBBCIQXUNGQFVZ6P6AENLU X-MailFrom: m.sandoval@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Michael K=C3=B6ppl writes: > 'Client' is the term more often used in the Proxmox VE documentation and > 'consumer' has been replaced by 'client' in the Ceph documentation to > avoid confusion [0]. `pveceph auth status` and the cephx health hints in > the GUI still used the old 'consumer'. Update output strings and > comments accordingly. This change is made to conform to the updated > documentation and the naming change in the cephx migration script. > > [0] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/dev/cephx/ > > Signed-off-by: Michael K=C3=B6ppl This is a follow-up of https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260908153932.577051-2-m.sandoval@proxm= ox.com/. Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Maximiliano Sandoval --=20 Maximiliano