From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD781FF0F1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:05:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CB6C821430; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:05:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Kefu Chai Subject: superseded: [PATCH manager 2/2] ceph: osd: stop running pveremove during cleanup In-Reply-To: <20260711050323.2573136-1-k.chai@proxmox.com> (Kefu Chai's message of "Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:03:23 +0800") References: <20260317123343.299525-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> <20260317123343.299525-3-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> <20260711050323.2573136-1-k.chai@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1783926297726 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.335 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 44P74WN47KBNUNWG2PQ6JRR34HHBN4WT X-Message-ID-Hash: 44P74WN47KBNUNWG2PQ6JRR34HHBN4WT X-MailFrom: m.sandoval@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Kefu Chai writes: > Verified: 7f007e7fc added api.remove_pv() to zap.py, so 'ceph-volume lvm > zap --destroy' drops the PV itself. It is in every Ceph release available > for PVE 9, so the pvremove here is redundant. > > Two nits: the message says Reef is the oldest supported Ceph in PVE 9, > but per PVE/Ceph/Releases.pm that is Squid (19.2), Reef is PVE 8 only. > Does not change the conclusion, 7f007e7fc is in Squid too. And the > subject reads 'pveremove', which looks like a typo of 'pvremove'. > > Reviewed-by: Kefu Chai Thanks for the review. Superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260713070433.36620-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com/T/#u -- Maximiliano