From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5311FF183 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:24:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A8E431EA3; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:25:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Resent-User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Resent-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Resent-Subject: Resent-From: Maximiliano Sandoval Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:25:21 +0200 From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: <20250813110328.330900-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> (Maximiliano Sandoval's message of "Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:03:25 +0200") References: <20250813110328.330900-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:22:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1755084289372 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.205 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy ENA_SUBJ_ODD_CASE 2.6 Subject has odd case KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/3] time: Add traits to DateTimeValue and TimeSpec X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" Maximiliano Sandoval writes: > which are useful for tests. > > Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval > --- > proxmox-time/src/calendar_event.rs | 1 + > proxmox-time/src/date_time_value.rs | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) In a support case we found a system with 40:00 as a schedule in a backup job. It is possible to entire this calendar event on the web UI. After this series the web UI won't allow it anymore with an error: ``` Parameter verification failed. (400) schedule: invalid format - invalid calendar event '40:00' - unable to parse calendar event at ':00' - Nom(Eof) ``` -- Maximiliano _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel