From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BF79F30 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:41:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 36C10A69A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:40:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 15674A68E for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:40:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 996E33CA3AC; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:40:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1nbIBt-0008EK-HX for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 10:36:01 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:17:32 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: <461hhi-f5n2.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1649060260 31404 192.168.1.24 (4 Apr 2022 08:17:40 GMT) To: Marco Gaiarin X-Mailer: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (Linux/5.4.0-107-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: <461hhi-f5n2.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>; from SmartGate on Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:36:01AM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.189 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Replication failed, got tiemout? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:41:01 -0000 > New installed PVE6 2-node cluster, totally unloaded; only some test VMs that > are replicated between the two nodes, conected via a 10G direct cable. > Sometimes we get: >   command 'zfs snapshot rpool/data/vm-103-disk-0@__replicate_103-0_1648656014__' failed: got timeout > What can be?! Thanks. We catch a log on /var/log/pve/replicate/, but seems, at least to me, not providing some more clue: 2022-04-02 14:00:14 103-0: start replication job 2022-04-02 14:00:14 103-0: guest => VM 103, running => 5167 2022-04-02 14:00:14 103-0: volumes => local-zfs:vm-103-disk-0 2022-04-02 14:00:16 103-0: create snapshot '__replicate_103-0_1648900814__' on local-zfs:vm-103-disk-0 2022-04-02 14:00:21 103-0: end replication job with error: command 'zfs snapshot rpool/data/vm-103-disk-0@__replicate_103-0_1648900814__' failed: got timeout I'm seeking info. Thanks. -- Fino a quando il colore della pelle sarą pił importante del colore degli occhi, sarą sempre guerra. (Bob Marley)