From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D072E1FF187 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 22:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B11623F38; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 22:40:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:14:19 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: <4e2222b8-f423-41e3-a6fb-522a6f792f0b@gilouweb.com> X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1758571662 1346257 192.168.1.45 (22 Sep 2025 20:07:42 GMT) To: Gilou X-Mailer: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.14.0-29-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 In-Reply-To: <4e2222b8-f423-41e3-a6fb-522a6f792f0b@gilouweb.com>; from SmartGate on Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 22:36:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.350 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 1.543 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Analysis of free space... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" Mandi! Gilou In chel di` si favelave... > What's the underlying storage? local zfs? > Does it have thin provisioning / sparse enabled? Yes, storage is ZFS, and 'Thin provision' is enabled. > Also inside the VM, make sure that all the stack is discard aware, LVM, > filesystem and all.. VM is an RH8, so pretty new, so have full support for discard. And, as just stated, trimming effectively free some TB of data, but not what we expect... Effectively the VM use LVM, but looking around seems to me that discard is 'transparent' against LVM, eg, there's no need/way to 'enable' or 'disable' it... if it is supported by the underlying storage... -- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user