From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1206062924
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:10:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 05FC32F109
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:10:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E60D32F0F1
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:10:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 47FBA3C96DF; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:10:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>) id 1nArk1-0002zQ-JK
for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:06:01 +0100
From: Marco Gaiarin <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:06:18 +0100
Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!!
Message-ID: <o5dqbi-gqb.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
References: <vlrnbi-53d.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
<2b2b8b20-480a-38d4-2a5c-cc58afac7fa5@konzept-is.de>
X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1642762846 9600 192.168.24.2 (21 Jan 2022
11:00:46 GMT)
To: Ralf Storm <ralf.storm@konzept-is.de>
X-Mailer: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (Linux/5.4.0-96-generic (x86_64))
X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 <news.lilliput.linux.it>
Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
In-Reply-To: <2b2b8b20-480a-38d4-2a5c-cc58afac7fa5@konzept-is.de>;
from SmartGate on Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 12:06:01PM +0100
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.010 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Trim and ZFS pools on SSD...
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:10:48 -0000
Mandi! Ralf Storm
In chel di` si favelave...
> make sure your Vdisks are connected via scsi and the scsi controller is
> virtioscsi, the discs need to have the checkmark "discard".
> You can check if it works under ubuntu and debian wit hte command
> "fstrim -av" - if there is no output it doesn`t work, otherwise, after a
> while you will get the trim results displayed.
No, sorry, i've posted two 'trim/discard' topic that (apart this) are
totally unrelated.
I'm speaking now of host OS, eg PVE: if i have an SSD-based ZFS pool, how
can i trim it?
Seems that recent 'zfsutils-linux' package add some 'framework' to do trim,
but seems (totally) undocumented. So i'm seeking feedback.
I hope i was clear now...
--
Dai diamanti non nasce niente
dal letame nascono i fior (F. De Andre`)