From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B3698A5B
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 470281E32A
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id D31E83CBB5B; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>) id 1preNN-0007YA-MT
for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:36:01 +0200
From: Marco Gaiarin <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:20:08 +0200
Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!!
Message-ID: <mfanhj-3sm.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
References: <6nj5hj-3a81.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
<mailman.86.1681974711.319.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1682512339 28769 192.168.24.2 (26 Apr 2023
12:32:19 GMT)
To: Eneko Lacunza via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-71-generic (x86_64))
X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 <news.lilliput.linux.it>
Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
In-Reply-To: <mailman.86.1681974711.319.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>;
from SmartGate on Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 14:36:01PM +0200
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.245 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] DELL PowerEdge T440/PERC H750 and embarassing HDD
performance...
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:40:15 -0000
Mandi! Eneko Lacunza via pve-user
In chel di` si favelave...
> What disk model?
HGST HUS726T4TAL
> sdc has only one backing HDD right?
Yes, it is called 'NonRAID' in newer PERC lingo; seems a RAID0 configuration
but with some more 'insight'...
> 84 IOPS is not much, but I don't think you can get much more from an HDD
> with random RW...
> PERC controller is quite new, maybe driver in PVE 7 is more optimized...
Uh, oh... never minded about that.
There's some way to at least test PVE7 kernel with PVE6?
--
chi si convertiva nel novanta
ne era dispensato nel novantuno (F. De Andre`)