From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD9C1FF164
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:22:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E909030D88;
	Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:22:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:14:49 +0200
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
In-Reply-To: <CAC9cSOB48cijLYctBoY=g8Zr9ToCj8_zn2UqZXHU13fmBfnKGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <84cf9af1-5e12-48fa-81ca-35547845683d@proxmox.com>
 <CAC9cSOAP_gf0G=MBmm+4WT1zpDPYHTYikBCan1LswzX55CSKHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <mailman.885.1744261726.359.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <2d16993e-e8d5-4ca8-b62e-0ccd0bfa27c4@proxmox.com>
 <CAC9cSOB48cijLYctBoY=g8Zr9ToCj8_zn2UqZXHU13fmBfnKGg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.958.1744402946.359.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Michael Rasmussen via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 8.4 released!
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2487471618501627515=="
Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

--===============2487471618501627515==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <mir@miras.org>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9279D47BB
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:22:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B854730C7E
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:21:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.eu (mail.datanom.eu [188.166.46.182])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:21:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.net (188-182-206-183-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net [188.182.206.183])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.datanom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA0E400D2
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:15:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF5D120493
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:15:00 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miras.org; h=
	content-type:content-type:mime-version:x-mailer:references
	:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from:date:date;
	 s=dkim; t=1744402493; x=1745266494; bh=uNKfaTietQCYhSUW/AjaYigP
	YlAPtm0Kk/dZGbHEI2A=; b=q5xxvK+KTm+vBFNZmL7MZgcKfxYtMTfmGKQ043Un
	yY/J7J+W5w27DfGBfbUlxmsr6dmDk8u6YsbBFNMjxG7byxHD/BSLI84zqKseDkfq
	MEfWqsF/oSI2yskzCTxbdHvwvmmmZRggWN+u4uZh7vu05V2xZ3C2nuhqJgD4v0mk
	rY0=
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) -
 iredmail.datanom.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at iredmail.datanom.net
Received: from mail.datanom.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (iredmail.datanom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id puSv6B1JY4wj for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>;
 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:14:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sleipner.datanom.net (unknown [192.168.2.79])
	by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77D6F12048F
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:14:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:14:49 +0200
From: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 8.4 released!
Message-ID: <20250411221449.2cbf7b47@sleipner.datanom.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAC9cSOB48cijLYctBoY=g8Zr9ToCj8_zn2UqZXHU13fmBfnKGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <84cf9af1-5e12-48fa-81ca-35547845683d@proxmox.com>
	<CAC9cSOAP_gf0G=MBmm+4WT1zpDPYHTYikBCan1LswzX55CSKHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<mailman.885.1744261726.359.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
	<2d16993e-e8d5-4ca8-b62e-0ccd0bfa27c4@proxmox.com>
	<CAC9cSOB48cijLYctBoY=g8Zr9ToCj8_zn2UqZXHU13fmBfnKGg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1git134 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-KEY: ftp://ftp.datanom.net/pub/claws/gpg-key.txt
X-Face: +UpSPFkh3^t&rI|{Ou$3/l]vjTk;D5c0k;*3p?O2c+:bV#y*0q4EWQ[Kdd2=;<u7g2~aE~I
 k%*K{!Q#D)Vaiiqy~hxUz_8)mTt:m#WPV$ls:"s,.;p7SNdq>PR}nK
Face: 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
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/cOdsHlv08+3RmnX0Dm1pCTe";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
	DKIM_VALID               -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	DKIM_VALID_AU            -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain
	DKIM_VALID_EF            -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
	DMARC_PASS               -0.1 DMARC pass policy
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
	URIBL_BLOCKED           0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.  See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [openpgp.org,miras.org]

--Sig_/cOdsHlv08+3RmnX0Dm1pCTe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:50:32 -0400
Federico Alves <venefax@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just out of curiosity, why should I use apt-get vs apt?
> what are the equivalent commands for apt?
>=20
>=20
apt is a drop-in replacement for apt-get so all options for apt-get
works with apt apt-get dist-upgrade is equivalent to apt full-upgrade


--=20
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/A1306C5094B5E31B7721A3A66F48=
44C7CA7501AA
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/0C14CD9479667E848770C8F98417=
B6C5E1BB093F
mir <at> miras <dot> org
https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/5F71405B571CB8EE2A414A4FC77C=
11E049A06E66
--------------------------------------------------------------

'During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act.' -George Orwell

Avoid unnecessary branches.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plaugher)

--Sig_/cOdsHlv08+3RmnX0Dm1pCTe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEX3FAW1ccuO4qQUpPx3wR4EmgbmYFAmf5eDkACgkQx3wR4Emg
bmZb2gf/ZRmac/8NiRhSLs507CH275CH5nsyDDVQfyy7Y+tDqlrGPAOSm0AIXeov
ZbvwS9LbBqQopgrsJuzlxHsAzA39oemLoZSpq9z3ZDLqQR5b1NLsOTb0ctUegZCt
FJ1zmK5Y6OWOK4kTRJ7qfmzJghRb6gjMUVZu4LwnSRgZomKUc12evb0voIBHbdyu
xWuPr4EpuLngNmvYh1Flyzr457g1Iae5qHNfC0NbDd2kDH/pWnm/MLnQvFXa4tOg
ZiTP1yDqXVHQ03xdJmTKAkU70mUgKXAgGN5oaxzLLr8qmR8p0NuSOPe1lzSnyfoc
7u87V72cbnokJXKqZiEYCzQ9XhDDzg==
=RT6y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/cOdsHlv08+3RmnX0Dm1pCTe--


--===============2487471618501627515==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

--===============2487471618501627515==--