From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FD01FF170 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 23:38:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D37D08190; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 23:39:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 17:34:02 -0400 To: Proxmox VE development discussion MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Andrei Perapiolkin via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Andrei Perapiolkin X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] Handling 'path' requests during VM deletion Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7367353057858102682==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============7367353057858102682== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEEC0D3453 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 23:39:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9DDFB80DD for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 23:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 23:39:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=open-e.com; s=s1-ionos; t=1754602754; x=1755207554; i=andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com; bh=U77ou+gh654ENm7REfx+UHd+gc1GPYNNrjCUl9vnwp0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From:Subject: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc: content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id: mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=aU1eIaqYdbCBS6NFj8rjiGNVtYAUBpwt2PxREt/e6ziaH2YPTm+fMHsy4hDslagK TUm/gUXOWoMe6Oaqgy/X/LaOEhhixL+AiuFkM6KAb7de2y7bY3I9j53P6LGoL8UCG YUznc4fE1CJ1TTIC0T16k6ystLznhglgVTfdp089M3T9mw7sl44drnHKXDEDt+6hI lQPOh6WhI/WBAUbdCazJo3AP0NX9k/1idRd1xmb4awQMVa8Aj52cCBTs60LkC5FQa p1TIDjZRb4dJM8TVQOQ73tuayw8mJa/orbifch76w8f8d2O8HnahvhNYGrLJ0bOGc dj7kUcT/6+fFlJUIbw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 55c96926-9e95-11ee-ae09-1f7a4046a0f6 Received: from [10.137.0.75] ([149.102.246.43]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MLAF0-1v2LaT3vxi-00TVvz for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2025 23:34:04 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 17:34:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion From: Andrei Perapiolkin Subject: [pve-devel] Handling 'path' requests during VM deletion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:iNDG01lftMpUaMKEtG7RTcJJPjxSs1GnuZhQ6Oho6KcVeGMG8GE 5d6ww7SVrW4lvghtwAoudNAGG7Q8E/l1kKgQLn1vStSrHyezNdGA7TlpazthJSpWJlhLCKI Gl8IhEae5TerwQcJzVOIxWHD2hr6zZu1aDFXYaffhPPJHhBGf1fqfjGxdyghWR+2WbWa1K+ aO4L/mu6KpqtthHxzK6Gg== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:jDDyAzV39JM=;xqJcSR6dNmx61++61gl7bhfUpvW 1pFtRobsa7xgdVX9WrN/PrREKev2i+vwToucTM0AnUofENDPQ6OskiFlx6vmkIevTIBLXBFBU Jvszn5PaeeseoPuCfJhXnZ+zA8LHCkGI/B/6wUZAu0/HChoL6GaBKQRkSqlio8XVUzrTx/+Ff Kl2sv2zmKcMFFJBnQ8MiEF8aRnQA47YG9diY1+OV3dmYHTwaf0aBHeC+F6UZtnMKC8sb4nuFj yPC3yTsj9bvgFW7sbzdxdImWhhaj71xcINyr1NTZWwjLNS9n8XUXnN4WApwbUhEykj7yJkZyG TVLevNzNzoavjgzaL+SDK59Ht0FPex4ZclSXQGNSg0dCqc2lWee+hVNKJ//g29hRl6pnIE8Ae CWhvfwDpNiHB0KpEvylm2Sy7rFtqx6WzSxYcO5kseSTrakx44FhzYlMyacyANUdWzisV6mnJY kPqjuJ18Kzl6U0+qUfMfZBFRYW9l1qxfLXzMJvFN34aYLffXUETds3+qobY7dpsSp8TbDAVU7 f/K1ojQbHBXfEpnyYuS3Rg/bJgLH24+PfEfJHsWXxz/wzHbztu7u0A5xWwh/DZvk8a3M6wafc O4Wf08FGIU3w6gWduu8taatqJHeTcXm9buv3dspufsCPOFR4Xx5yh2Ex51FCteY0u5x4MuPLB bq4zkUiemHsYMjvTc0g7cNm3yrCJOpYhO85Ysv7J8/CGjKw3YlYB8NhkRbuT6lJl975lxDH/w Oj8x6Cg95qNTBBkCgeMm4kOaqV2sGd+9OQcQ9z6e8kffK2+02+WUHjRzgt8qzTtCTMIBKj4SX BGte9bGCV3iCMHvyieQpHYHE5CodByIQhjbTXlNUo/VMJeZcanStDcpmu/pLbhzwNmXli1blz LJ8aW/0DmKrC1s1Xr6UXyD/g01SjI67IafzQnMC9wUttfbtb4c83uuCc7R6KNPZ5taHbkQZcb 7B4tU3eHMvPLveVCwM2Bn1BNHvN9sG4buQdgG6OKncAR4T7jkGVIRAQJQ/QqPFgaVdFcpk7mD J2QLSTd37vuJa4V1SiOROhgiam8iA9XPXqAk7SkaWQ45VPlKnEfhKh/O7X4X9Xm3GzpC8v99u fkpXxzPqNZp4eWTBsmxTzJyNRAMb3oJpPMuuentUNbT30QuOCzhQfsN0oq4PIQy7MO7ZrxZNm vULVOr44TUNcyZZ53pDP4q2/XPnvPRAnNV6Faej46JgR2+QJ5CzksP4Ljtup/UN7NpzakdIfn GkqRF22gyvQdIF8ypF810WE9XspNvdYQdsBTQUjhs3IGOhnLttrRuy/Qe/n1rwwYEsbtYqxKd nmO8gE4QyaQv4C+37/XRJjnlGSSyU+A2hK7qcrekxU1iNNn4OUKGnsg/zevlbsYa+gC05aNcr S4tWpNOCw7k1VKkjY4FerTGiHUoR4JCXXmBhsIeEmGZz1/B3CLCjo7SKAjGUg++90blMhX7eP 50oH5ro6sMB6YetTR/BmYzi5czl8glSmRgmY3PgjLzlwePD8smJLr/WNtYT/+a/JzJnZqsrnZ g0SE3A5lq8zxMlI/vhhU/Cfi3wNVMEWxZ0nOTZEzcfuiRO9GM9Po8t4inPQSTNtx2/yQHflwS RDXcIzlWJZ70lansbj0yInt2fAPtUEn X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Hi, VM deletion retries 'path'/'free_image' for already-removed volumes;=20 expected plugin behavior on missing volumes is unclear. When deleting a VM with multiple attached volumes, Proxmox deletes=20 volumes sequentially (one at a time) and updates the VM record only after all deletions complete. If a volume deletion fails mid-process (e.g., network error), the VM=20 record is not updated even though some volumes may have been=20 successfully removed. A subsequent delete attempt repeats all operations, including 'path'=20 (and 'free_image') calls for volumes that were already deleted. What is the proper response to 'path' and 'free_image' calls for a=20 volume that no longer exists? For path, should the call fail (e.g., 'die'), succeed with an empty=20 string, or return a 'storage path'? Tested on Proxmox VE 8.4.0 Best regards, Andrei Perepiolkin --===============7367353057858102682== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============7367353057858102682==--