From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476681FF187 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:10:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4AA8A301D; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:10:18 +0000 To: "Proxmox VE user list" In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Alwin Antreich via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Alwin Antreich X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces... Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2883255471904743879==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============2883255471904743879== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CE2DA17B for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 513882F5A for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (mx.antreich.com [173.249.42.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:10:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.antreich.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4F4E1760BC2 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 14:10:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to :subject:subject:to:to; s=2025; bh=tRrLEk66glOmGa6GiVbkbNHwneMJR GcrWHiMeojTpWA=; b=c5r62QIhDR+MWNk/1VcGPj9SBgxpq02SRzNOGD6yvQ6hZ 7eH3yPTBVys8xFuVpO9PhcUztTsjwZPjJM8mXv6l6hXB2/VleQGIwmGsRQo7EnUX 9TbiIeyrC1hQ16roOmQFwq4yoYZuQFzSPI1rWtnFPHBzr//mNMcz8CnzX+/It2eT QLe7/jAJMc2quze6bwec+EuMRbU0nf4wgkTfXZkTGgqClQWH/adpvEbMeIPD1sWo KRVx9Y5UK82NRysSlTLpte7NXyi2wy/CFoUM9Fhsc5VULyS4VVKh81Ec3srHva+/ pwmdM0+u7jK2+8dAF2P+Q2APEfgrGUpgmXiekBu1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:10:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Alwin Antreich" Message-ID: <16f2c158a1e3a63e9986a14080a23c74b3c189a4@antreich.com> TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces... To: "Proxmox VE user list" In-Reply-To: References: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.081 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Hi Marco, October 2, 2025 at 12:54 PM, "Marco Gaiarin" wrote: >=20 >=20Some servers, all upgraded from PVE6 to PVE7 and then PVE8. >=20 >=20Still i have some server Dell PowerEdge T440 that, sometime, not ever= , fail > to rename interfaces, some log: >=20 >=20 Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[891]: lo: Invalid network interf= ace name, ignoring:=20 >=20 Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: eth1: Could not set Altern= ativeName=3D or apply AlternativeNamesPolicy=3D, ignoring: File exists > Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: ens1f1: Failed to rename net= work interface 3 from 'eth1' to 'ens1f1': File exists > Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: ens1f1: Failed to process de= vice, ignoring: File exists > Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[899]: eno1: Could not set Alternat= iveName=3D or apply AlternativeNamesPolicy=3D, ignoring: File exists >=20 >=20clearly, ifup2 does not found ens1f1 and don't bind the interface to = the > bond. >=20 >=20I need to check manually the bond: >=20 >=20 root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond0 > 2: ens1f0: mtu 1500 qdisc mq m= aster bond0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > 5: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq mas= ter bond0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > 10: bond0: mtu 1500 qdisc noq= ueue master vmbr0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond1 > 6: eno2: mtu 1500 qdisc mq mas= ter bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > 12: bond1: mtu 1500 qdisc noq= ueue master vmbr1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond2 > 4: ens5f0np0: mtu 9000 qdisc m= q master bond2 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > 7: ens5f1np1: mtu 9000 qdisc m= q master bond2 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > 9: bond2: mtu 9000 qdisc noqu= eue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 >=20 >=20find missing interface: >=20 >=20 root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep eth[0-9] > 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq mas= ter bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 >=20 >=20and manually bind them: >=20 >=20 root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~# ip link set eth1 master bond1 > root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond1 > 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq mas= ter bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > 6: eno2: mtu 1500 qdisc mq mas= ter bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > 12: bond1: mtu 1500 qdisc noq= ueue master vmbr1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 >=20 >=20Why? It is better to fire up a bug? >=20 No,=20that is the usual thing to do when upgrading. ;) Till PVE9 at least= , the pinning tool should help you there. https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#network_pin_naming_= scheme_version Cheers, Alwin --===============2883255471904743879== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============2883255471904743879==--