From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38EA41FF179 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:03:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F6B3208EC; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 14:03:40 +0000 To: "Proxmox VE user list" In-Reply-To: <5letql-mot2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> References: <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> <5letql-mot2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Alwin Antreich via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Alwin Antreich , pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Analysis of free space... Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5339614628627915876==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============5339614628627915876== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44CD8D8620 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:03:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2E972208BC for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:03:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (mx.antreich.com [173.249.42.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:03:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.antreich.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D4B97640A0 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:03:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=2025; bh=bLkS1yn48FZJNa/jRx7u UrUhTciHARAo80F7n/TpKE4=; b=0fH9JIIN0l/5CZiBKHRhFG/cO7BKwYCjU3uU 9pe/lBhMP3GgscCbA4AXWqPpMIx9WA/FrfLhlk47amP1hzsdkZ1hENN9Eushf1kl bQLozSef2n4NZGV8Oxqep/nXmT+YDrjgZqMe766M4wJaljyo+pQp6jPYbLQL/W5d dzJd36iMRHOWQbdIYe2/i+MRZgwskQbQ+t6xL04o/YAe3gbcb9iQt/Mpooosd8NT iDLBJYMnkG7IIMre9rfETWOnpQVthZwuTRXYXyIpelvKrTfljuNOLXbC0c8mo1yI IbVA/jfCezEkdIvF/neXGFUHtvveJ3X1OXXgeUus8QWPaUeQLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 14:03:40 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Alwin Antreich" Message-ID: <1ebe319f6c59e48d62876498e281d4e838cbf76f@antreich.com> TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Analysis of free space... To: "Proxmox VE user list" Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: <5letql-mot2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> References: <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> <5letql-mot2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.084 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record September 30, 2025 at 6:55 PM, "Marco Gaiarin" <[gaio@lilliput.linux.it](= mailto:gaio@lilliput.linux.it?to=3D%22Marco%20Gaiarin%22%20%3Cgaio%40lill= iput.linux.it%3E)\> wrote: > Mandi! Matthieu Dreistadt via pve-user=20=20 >=20In chel di\` si favelave...=20=20 >=20=20=20 >=20 > > you can check "zfs list -o space", which will give you a more detaile= d=20=20 >=20> view of what is using the space: >=20 >=20=20=20 >=20\[...\]=20=20 >=20 > > Used =3D overall used=20=20 >=20> Usedsnap =3D Used by Snapshots=20=20 >=20> Usedds =3D Used Disk Space (not counting snapshots, only live data)= =20=20 >=20> Usedchild =3D Used by datasets/zvols further down in the same path = (in my=20=20 >=20> example, rpool has the same amount of Used and Usedchild space, sin= ce=20=20 >=20> there is nothing directly inside of rpool itself) >=20 >=20=20=20 >=20Thans for the hint. Anyway:=20=20 >=20=20=20 >=20[root@lamprologus:~#](mailto:root@lamprologus:~#) zfs list -o space |= grep ^rpool-data/=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-0 11.6T 1.07T 0B 1.07T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-1 11.6T 1.81T 0B 1.81T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-10 11.6T 1.42T 0B 1.42T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-11 11.6T 1.86T 0B 1.86T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-12 11.6T 1.64T 0B 1.64T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-13 11.6T 2.23T 0B 2.23T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-14 11.6T 1.96T 0B 1.96T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-15 11.6T 1.83T 0B 1.83T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-16 11.6T 1.89T 0B 1.89T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-17 11.6T 2.05T 0B 2.05T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 11.6T 3.39T 0B 3.39T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 11.6T 3.40T 0B 3.40T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-2 11.6T 1.31T 0B 1.31T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-20 11.6T 3.36T 0B 3.36T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-21 11.6T 2.50T 0B 2.50T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-22 11.6T 3.22T 0B 3.22T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-23 11.6T 2.73T 0B 2.73T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-24 11.6T 2.53T 0B 2.53T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-3 11.6T 213K 0B 213K 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-4 11.6T 213K 0B 213K 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-5 11.6T 1.48T 0B 1.48T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-6 11.6T 1.35T 0B 1.35T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-7 11.6T 930G 0B 930G 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-8 11.6T 1.26T 0B 1.26T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20rpool-data/vm-100-disk-9 11.6T 1.30T 0B 1.30T 0B 0B=20=20 >=20=20=20 >=20seems that really i was able to put 3.40T of real data on a 2T volume= ...=20=20 Hm...=20I assume you're running a RAIDz1? See the link: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#sysad= min_zfs_raid_size_space_usage_redundancy Cheers, Alwin --===============5339614628627915876== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============5339614628627915876==--