From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025EE1FF179 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10E3120069; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:46:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 13:45:56 +0000 To: "Proxmox VE user list" In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Alwin Antreich via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Alwin Antreich , pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Upgrade... Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2466802656756512219==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============2466802656756512219== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364E0D85FE for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 161261FFD6 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (mx.antreich.com [173.249.42.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.antreich.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AFF41763744 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:45:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=2025; bh=EBsc3Ao1kHlmtOE0bNX/ WpaBFSgOBk3EkP0tNQ5IOAU=; b=gbqwxWjCz87ZKHYdnnXtpvxIUtru2WCBUu/L 6PCe4hR8jFhxvS5rbYiZiPvJ6lRYjbSkAeHjUmfYp1CiDgSrK5ddH6fGmk9OJhxX N+389ptQ4lKqk2LRNSGX+Ejb2Eo1dI1uem8mhR1/QCVRo5fWSy8GPcMZoqUgaFC+ xAogXOC6NnJ7ZtjRI3/RSet8dzxuyJa87sxY5KkQEqRuAxsRaNTxlzEGo7I94AFb AZtTNNTYg0SIrs7CKp+k7ALVw6BCI+p14UyJe8XmzoClGwYcRq2KUQQRYatVUTTA LLwPV6uJftHXZ48AvTWWvuDcT+3C1+Ri82SkFrta2p/6PoQK3g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 13:45:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Alwin Antreich" Message-ID: TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Upgrade... To: "Proxmox VE user list" Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: References: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.086 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Hi Marco,=20=20 =20=20 September=2030, 2025 at 6:37 PM, "Marco Gaiarin" <[gaio@lilliput.linux.it= ](mailto:gaio@lilliput.linux.it?to=3D%22Marco%20Gaiarin%22%20%3Cgaio%40li= lliput.linux.it%3E)\> wrote: > Mandi! Alwin Antreich via pve-user=20=20 >=20In chel di\` si favelave...=20=20 >=20=20=20 >=20 > > > So, implicitly you confirm that it is GRUB that have some incompati= bilities,=20=20 >=20> > not GRUB in legacy mode... I've understood well? > >=20 >=20>=20=20=20 >=20> To my understanding, yes. Historically grub didn't (or still doesn'= t) support all features of a zfs pool on root. That's why the installer s= elects grub or systemd-boot \[0\] depending on system. >=20 >=20=20=20 >=20So, practically:=20=20 >=20=20=20 >=201) if i use systemd-boot i'm safe and i can safely upgrade boot zpool= =20=20 >=20=20=20 >=202) if i use GRUB, both in:=20=20 >=202a) legacy=20=20 >=20or=20=20 >=202b) UEFI=20=20 >=20mode, i'm in danger and if i upgrade boot pool, system get unbootable= .=20=20 >=20=20=20 >=20=20=20 >=20Clearly, if i have a system taht boot in UEFI GRUB, i can upgrade boo= tloader=20=20 >=20to systemd-boot (How?).=20=20 See=20here. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/ZFS:_Switch_Legacy-Boot_to_Proxm= ox_Boot_Tool Cheers, Alwin --===============2466802656756512219== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============2466802656756512219==--