From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23AB51FF161 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:33:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0B9CC1F063; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:32:13 +0200 To: Proxmox VE user list In-Reply-To: References: <58420306b884238ed47ae0a5b2c69913bd131ebb@antreich.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Alwin Antreich via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Alwin Antreich X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Upgrade... Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3467819853900524227==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============3467819853900524227== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29157D6626 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:32:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F14BC1EFCC for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:32:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (mx.antreich.com [173.249.42.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.antreich.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 677A2764103 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:32:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to :subject:subject:to:to; s=2025; bh=p3/5tREAEinFuaIo84sp5eElzgW2f XWEMwoFQXQWm1I=; b=oqETS2zRdSMFHHB67HulZpR0XcftFvXGP+ZRDWC4N/qIA g3KJobkrOMnn/vDjK4ejo8Le0nxWNqMvTQn0E3wKf+jCDP8pTVn0UW+q1OwTVGbd YCVNHQ6yHnYfgcUs6HqvVgNAvU2rydODYSh4S9VqQBo594/L2mEtkHoVlGKfMS8z JgmTk5sH/oDO/zzaDtj7GCHGko4dmTvzjS+HMWSuSHF+0SIrj44oz38B2hjPXRa/ iijZ5gdaZUc6uC8tLWmXFz0B5Lw1ODr2hEBJlW2g1p0/wX2qaBjgHvAI4rtcG+PG oYKu2drqbum2hfivCVT6GWOuNRPR79xYhjt/J8z5Q== Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:32:13 +0200 From: Alwin Antreich To: Proxmox VE user list Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Upgrade... In-Reply-To: References: <58420306b884238ed47ae0a5b2c69913bd131ebb@antreich.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.088 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com,antreich.com] >> If your system is running in EFI mode already, then consider converting = to >> systemd-boot=2E=C2=A0 > >So, implicitly you confirm that it is GRUB that have some incompatibiliti= es, >not GRUB in legacy mode=2E=2E=2E I've understood well? To my understanding, yes=2E Historically grub didn't (or still doesn't) su= pport all features of a zfs pool on root=2E That's why the installer select= s grub or systemd-boot [0] depending on system=2E Cheers, Alwin [0] https://pve=2Eproxmox=2Ecom/wiki/Host_Bootloader Hi, --===============3467819853900524227== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============3467819853900524227==--