From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06CA1FF191 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8895AEAFC; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 12:52:46 +0000 To: "Proxmox VE user list" In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Alwin Antreich via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Alwin Antreich X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Upgrade... Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3641195755965461493==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============3641195755965461493== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814BED4828 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6A7B0EAC5 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (mx.antreich.com [173.249.42.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.antreich.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 94EB5764E2A; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to; s=2025; bh=Xe+iwn0Mlq9NQMesYaflXan7od40k+nUrE66ngdyMZk=; b= pDNpnbyT6+ACif9TlYy2SAChQiUDf4JqgjyuqtfO4NBo4iZ2A1E8JV6o1ya/r9rk ajTKikh+x/F/4LJrkmDTPVfNlSOI3T7uA+yR/VeOU60lDVBVk9Up76+3nLbs1D6p is7o+pS69hGJyvdeut8dTZBLKsfh3laSBWCtt/baCx7k0zmKjv5iSU2VlAHUr3/d fc0YCMbbDIqo08eQGYxCH9ScSR1uCEap0wm7PGhVCwPhZXk1WNrD77vumIWd0R18 fE5z96qr9WTeZJ6MneIdQogbhJareY65exL95ovr1j1Kq7mys53vC1oSONXQfI+p XWcLm8vHgYnPUK5BVAb/wQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 12:52:46 +0000 From: "Alwin Antreich" Message-ID: <58420306b884238ed47ae0a5b2c69913bd131ebb@antreich.com> TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Upgrade... To: "Proxmox VE user list" In-Reply-To: References: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.090 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [antreich.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Hi Marco, September 22, 2025 at 4:21 PM, "Marco Gaiarin" wrote: >=20 >=20Someone have some feedback on this? Really i don't understand... Than= ks. >=20 >=20>=20 >=20> We have upgraded our server from PVE6 to PVE8, waited some month to= be sure > > there's no incompatibilities and now we are ready to remove older ke= rnels, > > and upgrade ZFS. > >=20=20 >=20> Current situation is: > >=20=20 >=20> root@svpve3:~# zfs upgrade > > This system is currently running ZFS filesystem version 5. > >=20=20 >=20> All filesystems are formatted with the current version. > >=20=20 >=20> and: > >=20=20 >=20> root@svpve3:~# zpool upgrade > > This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. > >=20=20 >=20> All pools are formatted using feature flags. > >=20=20 >=20>=20=20 >=20> Some supported features are not enabled on the following pools. On= ce a > > feature is enabled the pool may become incompatible with software > > that does not support the feature. See zpool-features(7) for details= . > > >=20 Did=20you look into the man page? `man zpool-features` You can find a list of features compatible with the grub version installe= d, see /usr/share/zfs/compatibility.d/ If your system is running in EFI mode already, then consider converting t= o systemd-boot.=C2=A0 Cheers, Alwin --===============3641195755965461493== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============3641195755965461493==--