From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C911FF17F for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 474AB3409E; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:55:08 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:45:53 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20240927134831.2655916-1-jing@jing.rocks> References: <20240927134831.2655916-1-jing@jing.rocks> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 09:55:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <mailman.152.1727769306.332.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> From: Jing Luo via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Precedence: list Cc: Jing Luo <jing@jing.rocks> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-perl-rs] common: buildsys: Makefile: drop `--no-pre-clean` Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5054655806816216869==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> --===============5054655806816216869== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <jing@jing.rocks> X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3480C17B9 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DD1081A1E2 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-gw3.jing.rocks (mail-gw3.jing.rocks [219.117.250.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:49:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-gw3.jing.rocks (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-gw3.jing.rocks (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6A5A620113 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:49:02 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jing.rocks; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to; s=mail-gw; bh=K+CK8ZZF+cNxNVj47t28Ijswwfvf8c5F7q5qLYebc/8=; b= F6rQjnOE8WoANklXA/+ActzbJ6mhuxC0P3NA0QOEWHbZ1/wIm0zm64wPxOPhnOFU IDSkh6f24zplC4v4uT6Dptg0mgJzqxZ2YIN4yb5a1IC0Ups5aMl3GQdto78mL/1u JZuG/8LJsUzhXb2Qzbe3w8BQLn2xsdAdo9UlO6sSHUvwySiwuplODwhIHHITG13w 5eFEd07d8Y297aqrAMK1/EWUEdK6mlAtlQKYhvW3PUpSN87k40bBjxhD7848NMxC PBp0W2vOOJyNYXY4H8B5SUPrS7l36U97EDPYb+uzvRMLB3SSYb6LxKW/ecQxvNpz E6QJXZoWx2awJgxGykVIaA== Received: from mail.jing.rocks (mail.jing.rocks [192.168.0.222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail-gw3.jing.rocks (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E57FE20112 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:49:01 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=jing.rocks; s=default; t=1727444941; bh=ndilQIyET0qHbVaHOevy0uDP+p+j50rw2qPiwUK4IZk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cAFoKRJelmWIyaT/JSl22ly0PDKUMoQLOJzeRW9+t9bW1y3jrsSEJEXDB+pNs6Gu7 DF/8543e1/dDl9yp/bdv4hLyOvpvxwvj1++wtWZ7zYTVLN4mwzyLjz5LVq3xtqBo8G oo6i2T+iYCm8+qUze38bwUHmX5ykBkD3+wW+Z+8Ezdz/+fSjIDGk7jYu6BB8PZIUMe QTM1Xlmj8JDhxR71WXPHtkN/Yf0CCDRZLaKFqQUKpFrl6Oi4ZAVaNMR1VZNtigPx8X Lx2vc3gfSykSPgwlv1IitDG74RJSz4lkH6kVGgsJENrSUpzhFdRFm5/DHPXGT+yj88 CmKbUI+Ri8emw== Received: from X570AM.jing.rocks (X570AM.jing.rocks [IPv6:240b:10:f00:1b00::7e82]) (Authenticated sender: jing@jing.rocks) by mail.jing.rocks (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D58A13FC1D; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:49:01 +0900 (JST) From: Jing Luo <jing@jing.rocks> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Cc: Jing Luo <jing@jing.rocks> Subject: [PATCH proxmox-perl-rs] common: buildsys: Makefile: drop `--no-pre-clean` Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:45:53 +0900 Message-ID: <20240927134831.2655916-2-jing@jing.rocks> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.2 In-Reply-To: <20240927134831.2655916-1-jing@jing.rocks> References: <20240927134831.2655916-1-jing@jing.rocks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75 Prevalent use of .info|.us|.me|.me.uk|.biz|xyz|id|rocks|life domains in spam/malware KAM_OTHER_BAD_TLD 0.75 Other untrustworthy TLDs SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 09:55:05 +0200 There is no difference in the source or binary packge running with or without `--no-pre-clean`. On the other hand, dpkg-buildpackge complains loudly when `--no-pre-clean` is specified, so let's remove it. Signed-off-by: Jing Luo <jing@jing.rocks> --- common/pkg/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/common/pkg/Makefile b/common/pkg/Makefile index 1e5cf1d..cbefdf7 100644 --- a/common/pkg/Makefile +++ b/common/pkg/Makefile @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ $(BUILDDIR): debian PVE Proxmox Makefile .PHONY: deb deb: $(DEB) $(DEB): $(BUILDDIR) - cd $(BUILDDIR); dpkg-buildpackage -b -us -uc --no-pre-clean + cd $(BUILDDIR); dpkg-buildpackage -b -us -uc lintian $(DEB) .PHONY: dsc -- 2.46.2 --===============5054655806816216869== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============5054655806816216869==--