From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE7D1FF183 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:53:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4626725442; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:54:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:54:16 +0100 From: Wolfgang Bumiller To: Fabian =?utf-8?Q?Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= Message-ID: References: <20251014102444.844799-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251014102444.844799-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1762350837857 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.079 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [mod.rs] Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox] schema: drop leftover useless i64 check X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" applied, thanks On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Fabian Gr=FCnbichler wrote: > since 7ac306e268e2840d258af41ce8cec890fc372351 IntegerSchema is no longer > isize, but i64, so this check is pointless. > = > Signed-off-by: Fabian Gr=FCnbichler > --- > clippy complained about the useless conversion here, sending on-list in c= ase I > missed something.. > = > proxmox-schema/src/de/mod.rs | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > = > diff --git a/proxmox-schema/src/de/mod.rs b/proxmox-schema/src/de/mod.rs > index 1f14503e..ea2115c5 100644 > --- a/proxmox-schema/src/de/mod.rs > +++ b/proxmox-schema/src/de/mod.rs > @@ -180,9 +180,6 @@ impl<'de> de::Deserializer<'de> for SchemaDeserialize= r<'de, '_> { > = > schema.check_constraints(value).map_err(Error::invalid)?; > = > - let value: i64 =3D i64::try_from(value) > - .map_err(|_| Error::invalid("isize did not fit into = i64"))?; > - > if let Ok(value) =3D u64::try_from(value) { > visitor.visit_u64(value) > } else { > -- = > 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel