From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBA031FF187 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:10:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C45B91867C; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:10:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 11:04:49 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: <4lgenl-oaf2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1756143654 2827554 192.168.1.45 (25 Aug 2025 17:40:54 GMT) To: dorsy via pve-user X-Mailer: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.14.0-28-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 20:06:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.456 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 1.543 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Quorum bouncing, VM does not start... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" Mandi! dorsy via pve-user In chel di` si favelave... > I'd suggest a direct link between the hosts for another quorum ring if > You have a spare network port. > Also multiple rings could be more resilient than MLAG. But that is only > my 2 cents opinion. > see: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pvecm.html#pvecm_redundancy > and: > https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pvecm.html#pvecm_corosync_over_bonds Thans for the links. Seems to me that also 'LACP fast' is a pretty decent solution for that! -- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user