From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4FBC69CCF
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2E36176D9
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7D9C7176CB
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 542D24488F
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <fba280a7-e40e-d3f1-e7d8-bd706e4a5163@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:03:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/93.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210913141829.2171301-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20210913141829.2171301-7-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210913141829.2171301-7-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.268 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [directory.rs]
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 5/7] api2:
 disks/directory: add 'name' property to directory mount listing
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:04:29 -0000

On 13.09.21 16:18, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> so that we have the properties that match with 'match_all'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/api2/node/disks/directory.rs | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied, with s/api2/api/ (the 2 just has zero benefit to have in the subject)
and adding the actual reason for doing this (or at least I tried), thanks!