From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D75A91F6E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:15:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 85B501F8FF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:15:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:15:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9ED2C48532
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:15:04 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <fab42876-e53e-44b8-ae0e-090a7ae2a8a7@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:15:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-AT, en-US
From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20231214094844.84950-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
 <c320f25b-ec97-4b1a-aba4-3a68e2edd046@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <c320f25b-ec97-4b1a-aba4-3a68e2edd046@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 0/2] notification: set
 'Remove' button text to 'Reset to default' for built-ins
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:15:05 -0000

ping - still applies on master. Retested it quickly, also seems to work fine.

On 1/8/24 11:43, Lukas Wagner wrote:
> ping
> 
> On 12/14/23 10:48, Lukas Wagner wrote:
>> Deleting a built-in target/matcher does not remove it, but resets it
>> to its default settings. This was not really obvious from the UI.
>> This patch changes the 'Remove' button text based on the
>> selected target/matcher. If it is a built-in, the button text is
>> changed to 'Reset to default'. Also, if the built-in is not actually
>> modified, the button is disabled.
>>
>> Lukas Wagner (2):
>>    remove button: allow to set custom confirmation message
>>    notify: change 'Remove' button to 'Reset to default' for built-ins
>>
>>   src/button/Button.js                | 10 ++++-
>>   src/panel/NotificationConfigView.js | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 

-- 
- Lukas