From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 730CE6399B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 16:40:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6169E1BA79
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 16:40:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1D9F41BA6D
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  5 Oct 2020 16:40:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D4E8644C1A;
 Mon,  5 Oct 2020 16:40:18 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Graeme Seaton <lists@graemes.com>
References: <7072d246-960d-1d1b-be3f-04edb39e8033@graemes.com>
 <32fe64ea-90b4-abb4-85e9-324420e9776c@proxmox.com>
 <5e238f85-d7b0-4cef-13d8-aa2e6012a61e@graemes.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <fa4f0c2b-fbbc-3b76-6dae-8b9a956d0ff1@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:40:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/82.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5e238f85-d7b0-4cef-13d8-aa2e6012a61e@graemes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.153 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Templates starting on backup
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:40:50 -0000

On 05.10.20 16:21, Graeme Seaton wrote:
> On 05/10/2020 14:42, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> What HW differences are talking here?
>
> In one case CPU type/Numa/hugepages.=C2=A0 In others vmbr's.=20

Why not just leave it at the "OK" hosts, if you're using HA you could
add it to a group restricted to those hosts it is compatible with.

We may reduce the configuration of a template started fort backup a bit,
though.

cheers,
Thomas