From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8DDB813F1 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:14:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A0893CAEC for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:14:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2202BCAE1 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:14:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id v11so419939wrw.10 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:14:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bcq7nUFFUkHImYDSMaxkpRtq4YcAChbkwFEhuh1c5ek=; b=gk6iibleK0Ad9XdrhMAZuSY7Ze9C+zixKu/WV9CJar7nQjv9Wn1UJprJzXvNQdVz3X Y5eFD164UV7fq6MLgICxiQtx3YfXIQ83HJlCKhDXLX0tzutFEf7GsCv6KSt/EOQ1/A9f vANzfc2HH87nETruTZRSfg191lBSoR68xe4qeQV7AFVDkMFFNMnH/9hk25d57DyaPgOm bu0LA7g5K54he3oRA4oZeTH8oIxw9Q8c59DXECbv3sTSeC+sa5Fd0GroBNJI4lGVSGiF B9t0uxbJsOtNEC9M9dWBz27RBmvGp5lGOFInrLAOXgNxvJuuBJCnvywsBaFwFTEfYckt oxBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to :subject:content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bcq7nUFFUkHImYDSMaxkpRtq4YcAChbkwFEhuh1c5ek=; b=vyb1llqb4/3bC8iJ1DXS8/sLAUIK7x9NO7fMqLB7KpdLNRTK8YXu99qe1cA4J+tYJp U0RimTjYe6w5hngv/0ImHQZNqzSj9gknlub9tjttbHhWi/PFF3b797ggGUdsUfLIXuIr 6K1fvvpjFv+cxuhwSJTdutpjozwkwgkxGbhHBC5oRPg3ifR3HxhS/DmjCc+39uP5boA8 sFCmzDUJeJiEjKOy6gSMnMqFwGLCEV4mYpMRzn+4qu2yKT2DIyDYp5Plo7d+V+pU8JGq slx1g6KAJu6IgSBWgBUSP6yRQCEhLKjKN5/qpkPc1OxC/vuzxNKGWtlUUKETbV4JrDAc GwdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ndHAW67ehOEbAUxSb967hPi2Lh3iOlOVU4I/lJsMiFPDXnZ4X pdPACh8P62DZ2Rkz2VWVSHnHaUVCsHg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFtS2b3T8KSW0Q5QVjucZmkgR56ZZCNRz271EKjF4SSrWuk3VlH3sPTcJftn4IdEuKSs1kgw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f88f:: with SMTP id u15mr5096530wrp.18.1637673255145; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ay21sm1051000wmb.7.2021.11.23.05.14.14 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:14:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <f75d787e-a72a-7517-f6c0-fd05f0d15c7d@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:14:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <8d0421f8-9c29-ddd4-fce2-068a2e9981c5@konzept-is.de> From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d0421f8-9c29-ddd4-fce2-068a2e9981c5@konzept-is.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.104 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.097 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] OS Error after upgrade to 7.1 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:14:54 -0000 Am 23.11.21 um 14:04 schrieb Ralf Storm: > Hello, > > I´m currently upgrading my 7-node Cluster, 1 node without problems, 2 nodes had renamed NICs to be > corrected, > > but the last Node stucks at boot with this message: "mpt2sas_cm0: overiding NVDATA EEDPTagMode setting" > > Anybody had this error before? Yes, unrelated to Proxmox. But the SAS controller works fine even with this message. Do you have issues accessing your storage? > > Best regards >