From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C01057810B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:28:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B138D1B6FA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:28:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B2EEA1B6EC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:28:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 875B946491
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:28:01 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <f6ed7c9a-4fba-aae8-d8c7-be5431d2ac17@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:28:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/89.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
References: <20210429110907.426597-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210429110907.426597-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: SPAM: [PATCH v2 docs] fix typos in various
 adoc files
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:28:02 -0000

On 29.04.21 13:09, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> checked for common misspellings. some of the changes (like favourite vs.
> favorite or virtualization vs. virtualisation) are because of US vs. UK english
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> * fixed up suggestions made by dylan, thanks!
> 
> 
>  certificate-management.adoc |  2 +-
>  local-zfs.adoc              |  6 +++---
>  pve-firewall.adoc           |  2 +-
>  pveceph.adoc                |  8 ++++----
>  pveproxy.adoc               |  2 +-
>  pveum.adoc                  | 13 ++++++-------
>  qm-cloud-init.adoc          | 10 +++++-----
>  qm-pci-passthrough.adoc     |  4 ++--
>  qm.adoc                     | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>  translation.adoc            |  2 +-
>  vzdump.adoc                 |  2 +-
>  11 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks to both of you! Note that it'd be also great to adapt touched
stuff to our technical writing guide[0], not all are minimal changes but some
like s/e.g./for example/ would be.

[0]: https://intranet.proxmox.com/index.php/Technical_Writing_Style_Guide